Do You Agree With The Judge Who Just Denied Britney Spears Her Freedom?

Just a few months ago Britney Spears was trending online after she exposed her father as an unfit conservator in relation to her wealth and well-being. Scrutiny of her case was heightened in the wake of "Framing Britney Spears," a documentary about her conservatorship released in February, helping to fuel the #FreeBritney movement on social media. The case went to court as Britney was seeking freedom. However, a US Judge on Wednesday denied the request to remove Britney Spears’ father as the conservator of her estate. Spears' request to suspend James "Jamie" Spears immediately upon the appointment of a financial institution as sole conservator of estate "is denied without prejudice," the Los Angeles Superior Court ruled. Spears, 39, has been under a legal conservatorship involving her father for over a decade. Last week in dramatic testimony, she alleged that she was overworked without any breaks, medicated with lithium and prohibited from having more children after her conservators did not allow her to remove her birth control device — decisions she said were approved by her father and co-conservator, Jamie Spears. During her testimony, Spears said, “I just want my life back. It’s been 13 years and it’s enough.” She added, “I feel ganged up on, bullied, left out and alone. And I'm tired of feeling alone. I deserve to have the same rights as anybody does, by having a child, a family, any of those things and more so.” Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Brenda Penny denied the singer’s request but did assign a financial institution, Bessemer Trust, as Jamie Spears’ co-conservator and Montgomery as Britney Spears' conservator of the person. Do you think the Judge was right in her verdict? Oops!...I Did It Again (Remastered)